Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Zumpfe

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1941No. 27,510PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, J.

Appellants are the holders of about 8% of the preferred stock of Piccadilly Realty Company, appellee David J. Smith holds the common stock, appellee McKinney is the receiver and the remaining appellees for themselves and others hold and represent the other 92% of the preferred stock of the company.

Appellants in describing the “nature of the action” say that they are seeking an appeal “from motion for new trial and. petition on motion to set aside confirmation of a sale of all of the assets of Piccadilly Realty Company to a corporation known as Indianapolis Piccadilly Corporation, based on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Feder v. FieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. American Mutual Life Insurance v. BertramIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Jenkins v. CorwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Blaemire v. BarnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Smith v. ZumpfeIndiana Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Wright, Mayor, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bachelder v. ParkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Schilling v. RitterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Andrews v. City of RichmondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Dugan v. DuganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API