Legal Opinion
Hutchins v. Durham.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 30, 1904PublishedCited by 17 opinions
ActioN by J. W. Hutchins against the School Committee of the town of Durham and others, heard by Judge II. B. Bryan, at chambers, in Greensboro, N. O'., October 28, 1904. From a judgment for the defendant the plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark C. J.
This is an application for a mandamus to the defendant Public School Committee to admit the daughter of the plaintiff to the public schools. The sole question presented is whether the following resolution is a reasonable exercise of the powers of tire school committee of the city of Durham:
“Whekeas, from, the report and recommendation of Dr. N. M. Johnson, Superintendent of Health of Durham County, in the judgment of this committee general vaccination of teachers and children attending the schools is desired and required for the public safety. Now, therefore, be it
“Besolved, That…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Duffield v. Williamsport School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- State v. . HaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Potts v. BreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Freeman v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- In re RebenackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Durham v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Durham Provision Co. v. DavesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Zucht v. San Antonio School BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- King Ex Rel. Harvey-Barrow v. Beaufort County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- Abney v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.