Legal Opinion

Hargett v. . Delisle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1948PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

Notwithstanding there veas a clause in the contract providing for arbitration of any disagreement arising out of the contract, the parties have elected to settle their differences in the law courts. The plaintiff has brought his action in the Superior Court and has filed notice of lien in accordance with the statute. The defendants have accepted the challenge in that tribunal, and filed answer denying indebtedness and setting up a cross-action. They ask affirmative relief in the Superior Court against the plaintiff. It is apparent that the parties have chosen to ignore and waive the provision…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. W. H. Blodgett Co. v. Bebe Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Williams v. Branning Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Kelly v. Trimont Lodge, No. 249Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Braddy & Gaylord v. New York Bowery Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Copney v. . ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cyclone Roofing Co. v. David M. LaFave Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Skinner v. Gaither Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. United States v. Al-Con Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  4. Cyclone Roofing Co. v. David M. LaFave Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Emmanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church v. Reynolds Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API