Legal Opinion
Fellman v. Royal Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 21, 1911No. 2,003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On petition for rehearing.
1Per curiam
The elaborate and well-considered opinion of Judge McCormick (184 Fed. 577) fully disposes of this case on the real question at issue between the parties, and we find nothing in the petition for a rehearing to affect the correctness of the same. To the objection that the case was not before us on the merits, because the record shows no exception to the judgment, nor any formal bill of exceptions, we deem it proper to give some consideration.
[1] The judgment below appears to have been on all the merits the case had and was final. The Suing out of a writ of error is a sufficient exception to a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Malony v. AdsitSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- England v. GebhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- British Queen Mining Co. v. Baker Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Raimond v. Terrebonne ParishSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Stryker v. Goodnow's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wastun v. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. of Ft. Wayne, Ind.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Philadelphia Casualty Co. v. FechheimerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Townsend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Ketteringham v. New England Fire Ins.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1948