Legal Opinion
People v. George M.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 1993No. A057311PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DOSSEE, J.
The minor George M. contends the juvenile court considered an improper factor when deciding to commit him to the California Youth Authority. He also contends the court improperly applied two enhancement statutes.
George M.’s point with respect to one of the enhancement statutes is well taken. We therefore modify the judgment to reduce the maximum term of commitment by three years and, as modified, affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
The juvenile court found true an allegation that George M. had committed the crime of assault with a firearm (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(2)).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. Michael D.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. FerrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. James A.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. Jesse F.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- People v. Jose P.California Court of Appeal · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re D.R. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- In re I.B. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- In re J.N. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re L.B. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re M.C. CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021