Legal Opinion
Hulstedt v. City of Scottsdale
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 6, 2012No. CV-09-1258-PHX-GMSPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 265), Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 271), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 333), and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Certification of Issue for Interlocutory Appeal. (Doc. 334). For the reasons stated below, each motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part, and both other motions are denied.
BACKGROUND
On November 7, 2008, at approximately 12:20 pm, David Hulstedt (“David”) called 9-1-1. Operator Christina Trott of the Scottsdale…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rabinovitz v. City of L. A.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Mason-Funk v. City of NeenahDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
- Prison Legal News v. BabeuDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Harianto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Andrich v. KostasDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.