Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Pedraza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 20, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Casey, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 23, 1988, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

In the decision on appeal the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board adopted the findings and conclusions of the Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) who found that claimant was engaged in covered employment within the *830meaning of the Unemployment Insurance Law and was, therefore, entitled to benefits. The disputed issue before the ALJ and the Board was whether claimant, who worked as a cable installer, was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PatinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. The Matter of the Claim of Luis A. Vega v. Postmates IncNew York Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API