Legal Opinion · Concurrence
State v. Sprague
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 14, 1976No. 75-3109, CA 5295Published
1Concurrence
SCHWAB, C. Jo,
specially concurring.
Defendant contends that a criminal nonsupport prosecution for any period prior to May 30, 1975, the date of defendant’s first nonsupport trial, is barred on *629the grounds of former jeopardy. ORS 131.515(2) sets out a three-part test establishing a statutory former jeopardy rule:
"No person shall be separately prosecuted for two or more offenses [1] based upon the same criminal episode, [2] if the several offenses are reasonably known to the appropriate prosecutor at the time of commencement of the first prosecution and [3] establish proper venue in a single…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. FitzgeraldOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.