Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Gillingham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1941No. 28008PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

In this cause, we are met at the outset by a motion, set forth in respondent’s brief, to strike the statement of facts upon the ground that there are not included therein “the complete record and all the proceedings and evidence in the cause.” It is said that it nowhere purports to show the examination of the jury, or the addresses to the jury, or the opening statements of counsel, and it clearly appears that it does not. The trial judge, however, has certified that it contains all the material facts, matters, and proceedings occurring in the cause, not already a part of the record therein,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brandt v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Chamberlain v. AbramsWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Johnson v. UpperWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Wolfe v. Wallingford Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Miller v. McCamishWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Richardson v. Taylor Land & Livestock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Schweiter v. HalseyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Miller v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API