Legal Opinion · Dissent

David Caron Chrysler Motors, LLC v. Goodhall's, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 29, 2010No. AC 30232Published

1DissentDupont, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, Goodhall’s, Inc., Good-hall’s Garage, Inc., and Lucille Goodhall, administratrix of the estate of Wallace Goodhall, Jr., should be *153affirmed. The majority reasons that because the plaintiffs, David Caron Chrysler Motors, LLC, and David A. Caron, failed to provide an adequate record for review by not seeking a necessary articulation of the trial court’s memorandum of decision, there is a presumption that the court properly determined that no lease existed between the parties.

I…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Phillips v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Morton Buildings, Inc. v. BannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Fellows v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Robinson v. WeitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API