David Caron Chrysler Motors, LLC v. Goodhall's, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1DissentDupont, J.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, Goodhall’s, Inc., Good-hall’s Garage, Inc., and Lucille Goodhall, administratrix of the estate of Wallace Goodhall, Jr., should be *153affirmed. The majority reasons that because the plaintiffs, David Caron Chrysler Motors, LLC, and David A. Caron, failed to provide an adequate record for review by not seeking a necessary articulation of the trial court’s memorandum of decision, there is a presumption that the court properly determined that no lease existed between the parties.
I…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Phillips v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. BannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Fellows v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Robinson v. WeitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.