Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Rubin

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 22, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

This is a proceeding brought by the decedent’s widow, the petitioner, as executrix for a construction of the decedent’s will pursuant to section 145 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. In addition thereto, she petitions the court to make a determination as to the validity of her right of election as provided for by section 145-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act.

The decedent and the petitioner executed a joint and mutual will on September 27, 1962. The introductory clause thereof sets forth that said instrument is also “ an Agreement binding upon us and the survivor ’ ’.

Each testator…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rastetter v. . HoenningerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. In re the Estate of WittnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. In re the Estate of MaulNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  4. In Re the Estate of MaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. In re the Estate of SilvermanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of Opal v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  2. In re the Estate of AquilinoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
  3. Estate of Siegel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  4. Estate of Opal v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  5. Estate of Siegel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API