Legal Opinion

James Alfred Martin v. Crown Zellerbach Corporation

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 21, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8225PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, sustaining the opposition of Crown Zellerbach Corporation to the registration by James Alfred Martin, doing business as Silko New Improved Products Company, of the composite mark “Silko ‘Soft-as-silk’ and red design,” for toilet tissue. The mark is illustrated in the board’s opinion, fully reported at 153 U.S.P.Q. 141, knowledge of which is assumed. Appellee’s registrations include No. 254, 779, April 2, 1929, of “SILK” for toilet paper; No. 385,-382, February 25, 1941, of “Silk”…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Giant Food, Inc. v. Nation's Foodservice, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Tektronix, Inc. v. Daktronics, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  3. Scott Paper Co. v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  4. Palisades Pageants, Inc. v. Miss America PageantCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. Hartwell v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API