Legal Opinion

Frederick Marion Fox v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 14, 1965No. 8308_1PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

In this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petitioner asserts that he is entitled to release because the term which he is serving was imposed by a sentence entered after the revocation of an illegal probation order. He previously raised the same point in an application for habeas corpus relief and we held that the § 2255 remedy was exclusive. See Fox v. Taylor, 10 Cir., 344 F.2d 753. He then invoked that remedy and the trial court denied relief in a decision which set forth the patient efforts of the judge to rehabilitate the petitioner and the petitioner's repeated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Joseph Lee Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Edward William LancerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Cynthia M. Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. John Culberson Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Herman Alexander RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API