Frederick Marion Fox v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
In this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petitioner asserts that he is entitled to release because the term which he is serving was imposed by a sentence entered after the revocation of an illegal probation order. He previously raised the same point in an application for habeas corpus relief and we held that the § 2255 remedy was exclusive. See Fox v. Taylor, 10 Cir., 344 F.2d 753. He then invoked that remedy and the trial court denied relief in a decision which set forth the patient efforts of the judge to rehabilitate the petitioner and the petitioner's repeated…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Joseph Lee Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Edward William LancerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Cynthia M. Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- John Culberson Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Herman Alexander RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.