Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Schwab

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1952No. 32190PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*816Hamley, J.

This case presents legal questions in connection with the proposal of public utility district No. 1 of Pend Oreille county to construct hydroelectric facilities at Box Canyon in that county.

The secretary of the district refused to attest and affix the seal of the district to a plan and system resolution for the construction and financing of this project. The district applied to the superior court for a writ of mandate to compel the secretary to perform these functions. Two taxpayers intervened in opposition to the application. After a trial of several days, the court entered…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State ex rel. Miller v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Group Health Cooperative v. King County Medical SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State Ex Rel. P.U.D. Etc. v. WylieWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. FIRST NAT. BANK ETC. v. TiffanyWashington Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Peterson v. HaganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Standow v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API