Field v. Lumbard
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Dodge county. Tried below before Marshall, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
This was an action on a replevin bond, in which a judgment of dismissal was obtained by the defendant. In the replevin action there had been a finding or verdict for the defendants therein, but the judgment was for the *398value of the property only, and not in the alternative, for a return thereof or its value, as the statute requires; and the defendant herein, the surety on the bond, asserted that, he was discharged because of this irregularity. A consideration of tlua question renders unnecessary an examination of the other questions involved.
It was in one case suggested, without…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eickhoff v. EikenbaryNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Goodman v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- Hooker v. HammillNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- Manker v. SineNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Lee v. Hastings & McGintieNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jackson v. Arndt-Snyder Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Larson v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Larson v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Securities Investment Corp. v. KrejciNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Clark v. OldhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.