Legal Opinion

Field v. Lumbard

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1898No. 7729PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of Dodge county. Tried below before Marshall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This was an action on a replevin bond, in which a judgment of dismissal was obtained by the defendant. In the replevin action there had been a finding or verdict for the defendants therein, but the judgment was for the *398value of the property only, and not in the alternative, for a return thereof or its value, as the statute requires; and the defendant herein, the surety on the bond, asserted that, he was discharged because of this irregularity. A consideration of tlua question renders unnecessary an examination of the other questions involved.

It was in one case suggested, without…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eickhoff v. EikenbaryNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Goodman v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Hooker v. HammillNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Manker v. SineNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Lee v. Hastings & McGintieNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Arndt-Snyder Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Larson v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Larson v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Securities Investment Corp. v. KrejciNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Clark v. OldhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API