Legal Opinion
Norred v. City of Shreveport
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 25, 1956No. 8593PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
AYRES, Judge.
The plaintiffs, husband and wife, instituted this action in tort against the City of Shreveport and Frank E. Heathcote to recover damages for permanent injuries, pain and suffering, for loss of earnings, and for hospital and medical expense occasioned by and as resulted from an accident involving the husband’s ■ automobile, operated at the time by his wife, and a street sweeping machine owned by the city and operated in its service by Heathcote,. its agent and employee.
For a cause of action plaintiffs allege in Paragraphs 3 and 8 of their petition as follows:
“3.
“On March 3, 1955,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hall v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Whitfield v. City of ParisTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Snider v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Rome v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- City of New Orleans v. KerrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barnett v. City of MonroeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960