Legal Opinion

Payne v. Muskegon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1994No. 94486, (Calendar No. 6)Published

1Opinion of the Court

444 Mich. 679 (1994)

514 N.W.2d 121

In re PAYNE

(PAYNE

v.

MUSKEGON)

Docket No. 94486, (Calendar No. 6).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued October 5, 1993.

Decided March 29, 1994.

Pinsky, Smith, Fayette & Hulswit (by H. Rhett Pinsky) for the plaintiff.

Parmenter O'Toole (by John C. Schrier) for the defendants.

BOYLE, J.

This case presents the question of the standard of review of the factual findings of a municipal civil service commission. We hold that a reviewing court should accept findings supported by substantial evidence. Because the common-law substantial evidence test satisfies the minimum…

2Cases cited89 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Arkansas v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API