Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Bell

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided June 26, 1989No. NMCM 89 1067Published

1DissentAlbertson, Judge

I concur with respect to the findings but I dissent with respect to affirmance of the sentence, as modified, because I find that a sentence which includes an unsuspended punitive discharge is inappropriate under the particular circumstances of this case. Since this Court cannot suspend punitive discharges, I am further constrained to find a punitive discharge inappropriate. Cf. United States v. Lucas, 28 M.J. 851 (AFCMR 1989). I find it essential to my own peace of mind to explain my concern.

Appellant was convicted, in accordance with his pleas of guilty, of two specifications of indecent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. RiveraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  3. United States v. LucasU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API