Legal Opinion · Dissent

Little v. Little

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1951No. 9077Published

1DissentJustice Anq-Stman

In addition to the facts set forth in the majority opinion it should be noted that the complaint contained a second cause of action seeking possession of certain described personal property other than the trailer in question. The Washington decree entered on September 2, 1949, dealt with a second trailer. It adjudicated rights in favor of, as well as obligations against, defendant Walter L. Little. It required plaintiff to relinquish possession of a certain Covered Wagon house trailer belonging to defendant Walter L. Little. It required him to return to plaintiff the items of personal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. German v. GermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  2. Bruton v. TearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Ostrander v. OstranderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Cousineau v. CousineauOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Fanchier v. GammillMississippi Supreme Court · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API