Legal Opinion
McCoy v. Foss Maritime Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 31, 2006No. C04-2233LPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION IN LIMINE
LASNIK, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs “Motion In Limine Based on the Doctrine of Collateral Estoppel” (Dkt.# 17). Plaintiff Tommy McCoy is a chief engineer for the Foss Maritime Company (“Foss”). McCoy argues in the instant motion that collateral estoppel should serve to preclude Foss from disputing certain factual and legal findings arrived at in a similar case, Montaperto v. Foss Maritime Co., No. 98-1594, 2000 WL 33389209 (W.D.Wash. Nov.9, 2000). Foss contends that collateral estoppel should not apply in this case…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Resolution Trust Corporation v. Charles H. Keating, Jr., Resolution Trust Corporation v. Mary Elaine Keating Charles H. Keating, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Stephen P. Havens v. F/t Polar Mist, U.S.C.G. Official Number 604676, in Rem, Arctic Vessel Management, Inc., in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mount v. Keahole Point Fish, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2015
- MS Amlin Marine NV v. Delta Marine Industries IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025