Legal Opinion

Honeycutt v. Scheidt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1961No. 533PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.

G.S. 20-16 provides: “(a) The Department shall have authority to suspend the license of any operator or chauffeur with or without preliminary hearing upon a showing by its records or other satisfactory evidence that the licensee: (9) Has, within a period of twelve (12) months, been convicted of two or more charges of speeding in excess of fifty-five (55) and not more than seventy-five (75) miles per hour, or' of one or more charges of reckless driving and one or more charges of speeding in excess of fifty-five (55) and not more than seventy-five (75) miles per hour.”

It is provided in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EllettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. Fox v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Harrell v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Harvell v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. State v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Joyner v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. PageSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API