People v. Bryant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court’s procedure for handling two jury notes violated the procedure enunciated by the Court of Appeals in People v O’Rama (78 NY2d 270, 277-278 [1991]) is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Ramirez, 15 NY3d 824 [2010]; People v Mateo, 53 AD3d 1111, 1112 [2008]; People v Battle, 15 AD3d 413, 414 [2005]; People v Mitchell, 2 AD3d 145, 148 [2003]; People v Neal, 268 AD2d 307 [2000]; People v Burgos, 248 AD2d 547 [1998]), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Since the jury merely requested…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. StarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. RamirezNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. MuradAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. LockleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. GerraraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. AlcideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. KahleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.