Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Barr

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 5, 1923No. 10,443PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

*88Barr, president of school board district No. 21, Adams county, obtained a decree enjoining Merrill, county treasurer of Adams county, from paying certain warrants of joint district No. 29, in Adams and Arapahoe counties. Merrill brings error.

1. It is claimed that, because the holders of the warrants were not made parties, the court could not enter the decree; but this objection was to a defect of parties and was waived by answer to the merits, as we have many times held. Bliss Code Pl., 417; Webb v. Smith, 6 Colo. 365; Green v. Taney, 7 Colo. 278, 3 Pac. 423; Schoelkopf v. Leonard, 8 Colo.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fillmore v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Green v. TaneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Sams Automatic Car Coupler Co. v. LeagueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  4. Hayden v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Sweet v. BarnardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Colorado State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. People Ex Rel. Vollmar v. StanleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Denver Land Co. v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Walsmith v. HudsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Davis v. LarsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API