Title USA v. Maricopa County
Arizona Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURPHY, Judge Pro Tem.
The issue in this case is whether Taxpayers’ land should have been classified as “vacant land” or land “used for agricultural purposes” for tax years 1991 and 1992. Taxpayers’ land is comprised of approximately 150 acres and is located within the city limits of Tempe. Sixty percent of the land is owned by the W.P. Ritter Limited Partnership. Forty percent is owned by Thomas and Patricia Tait. For purposes of this Opinion, the Court will refer to these owners as “Taxpayers.”
Since October 1988, Taxpayers have “dry farmed” barley on their land, using rainfall as the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. ReynoldsArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax AppealsArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. WarrenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Escalanti v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- A & P Ranch Ltd v. Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025