Legal Opinion
Padilla v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 9, 2021No. A170284PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
300 Argued and submitted July 8, 2020, reversed and remanded September 9, 2021, petition for review denied January 20, 2022 ( 369 Or 209) Danielle PADILLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. Linn County Circuit Court 18CV23714; A170284
499 P3d 100
In this civil appeal, plaintiff contests the trial court’s determination that cer- tain personal injury protection (PIP) benefits were limited by statute to 52 weeks. Plaintiff was seriously injured while riding as a passenger in an automobile and was unable to return to work after the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Centennial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Employers' Fire Insurance v. Love It Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Dowell v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harvick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021