Legal Opinion

Montooth v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 7, 1922No. 12939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; James I. Phelps, Judge. Action by W. A. Smith against G. L. Mon-tooth and another on promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

PITCHFORD, V. C. J.

This cause was commenced in the district court' of Oklahoma county, Okla., by ,the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error on a promissory note executed on the 12th day of February, 1917, in favor of defendant in error. Hereafter the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court

On the 14th day of June, 1921, the cause came on regularly for trial before Hon. James I. Phelps. At the conclusion of the evidence, a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants. On the 2nd day of July, 1921, the motion filed by defendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myers v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Cripple Creek Oil Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Samuel Dodsworth Book Co. v. FulcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gordon v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Cottingham v. CottinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API