Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Kennedy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1982No. C.D. 5965PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

This is an attorney discipline case presenting the question of the appropriate discipline for an attorney who violated various disciplinary rules stemming from acts of deceit, neglect, and unpreparedness, as well as failure to pursue and prejudicing the interests of a client. We adopt the Bar Association Disciplinary Board's recommendation of a 60-day suspension.

This disciplinary action arose from Mr. Kennedy's failure to represent the defendant's insurer in the personal injury case of Graves v. P.J. Taggares Co., 94 Wn.2d 298, 616 P.2d 1223 (1980). He was unprepared for and was not present…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parkridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Graves v. P. J. Taggares Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KumberaWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re ZdericWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re RoselliniWashington Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Matter of DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AnschellWashington Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API