Legal Opinion

Barron v. Feist

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

■ Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, third, district.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

This is an appeal from an order vacating a judgment of the Municipal Court. The facts in the case are substantially undisputed. It appears that the pleadings were verified. Upon the day of trial the parties appeared and by their respective attorneys made certain admissions. Certain claims set forth in the complaint were admitted and a contract between the parties, the basis of the cause of action, was also admitted as evidence by consent. These several admissions raised an issue of law, and the case was submitted to the court on November 28, 1905. Judgment in favor of the defendant was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lackner v. American Clothing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Catlin v. RundellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Buchsbaum v. FeldmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
  4. Ryan v. BrownAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  5. Ostrom v. SapolskyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trustees of Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund v. FontanaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
  2. Smith v. Haverty's StablesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Trainor v. Furlong-Tompkins Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API