Legal Opinion

Ostrom v. Sapolsky

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment and order of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, Second District, borough of Manhattan.

1Per curiam

The motion made by the plaintiff herein was, clearly, a motion to amend or modify the judgment and, as such, came within the provisions of section 254 of the Municipal Court Act; and, not having been made within five days, as therein prescribed, the court below had no jurisdiction to entertain it and could not grant the relief asked for. Buschbaum v. Feldman, 43 Misc. 85. The appeal herein, however, being from the judgment as well as the order, this court may, upon appeal, “ reverse, affirm or modify the judgment or final order appealed from” (§ 310, Mun. Ct. Act), and the judgment herein may…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buchsbaum v. FeldmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barron v. FeistAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  2. Abramson v. BrimbergAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
  3. Musica v. AmalfitanoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API