Legal Opinion

Hope Flooring & Lumber Co. v. Boulden

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 3, 1954No. 14895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.

This case involves a somewhat important question of Arkansas procedural law, which had not been settled by the courts of that State when the appeal was argued to us, but which was then the subject of pending litigation between other parties in those courts. Under the circumstances, we deemed it advisable to withhold our disposition, until expression had been made upon the question in that litigation by the Arkansas Supreme Court. That Court has now spoken. Winfrey & Carlile v. Nickles, Adm’r, 270 S.W.2d 923.

The question is whether a lawyer is entitled to charge, or a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Winfrey & Carlile v. NicklesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. LanzaDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
  2. Hope Flooring & Lumber Company v. BouldenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API