Legal Opinion
Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Lanza
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided June 2, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 356PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.
The present proceeding arises upon a petition for distribution of money paid in satisfaction of the judgment heretofore entered in this case. 116 F.Supp. 491. The primary question raised by the petition relates to the proper disposition of attorneys’ fees, and the determination of this question requires a reference to the proceedings heretofore had in the case.
In January, 1953, Lonnie Sisney, Virgil C. Carroll, and Paul A. Jennings were employed by Harry B. Hogan, a contractor. On January 26, 1953, Sisney, Carroll and Jennings were injured by the negligence of a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Hertzog v. HertzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
- City of Ft. Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- United States Ex Rel. Bruce Co. v. Fraser Const. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949
- Winfrey & Carlile v. NicklesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Consolidated Underwriters of South Carolina Insurance v. BradshawDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
- Sureck v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1973
- Orintas v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- Phillips v. Morton Frozen FoodsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1970
- Hatten v. Little Rock DodgeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.