Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Burris
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 20, 1932No. Nos. 5512, 5513PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRONER, Associate Justice.
This is a case arising under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (Act of March 4,1927, 44 Stat-. 1424, 33 USCA | 901 et seq., made applicable to the District of Columbia by Act of May 17, 3928, 45 Stat. 600 [Tit. 19, §§ 11 aud 12, D. C. Code 1929, 33 USCA § 901 note]). Tho deputy commissioner denied compensation. The lower court, on a petition for injunction, thought the deputy commissioner’s conclusion was wrong and entered an order setting aside the finding. The case is here on appeal and cross-appeal.
The question we have to decide is this: Does…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Rau v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Claim of Hughes v. Trustees of St. Patrick's CathedralNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- City of Joliet v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Young v. Western Furniture & Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1917
- Skelly Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Friend v. BrittonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Greenwich Collieries v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, and Andrew OndeckoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Robinson v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.