Legal Opinion

Underwood v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1946No. 3248PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

In January, 1939, Saulsbury Oil Company 1 employed R. E. Underwood, R. C. Johnson, J. B. Dooley, and R. A. Wilson, lawyers, practicing at Amarillo, Texas, under the name of Underwoodj Johnson, Dooley & Wilson2 to prosecute its claims against Phillips Petroleum Company3 arising out *373•of the purchase by Phillips from Saulsbury •of residuals from gas produced from leases belonging to Saulsbury in Wheeler and Gray Counties, Texas. Saulsbury agreed to pay the Underwood firm a contingent fee sufficient to net it 25 per cent of any recovery. From the date of its employment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Barnes v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Hutchison v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. United States v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Hallgarten v. OldhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hassett v. Far West Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Edward Meyers Caldwell v. J. Reuel Armstrong, Trustee in Bankruptcy, United States of America, and Dixie Faye Caldwell SheaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  3. Four Star Aviation, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Moulton & Powell Moulton & Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  5. Cleveland Trust Co. v. State Ex Rel. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API