Legal Opinion
Tardie v. Rehabilitation Hosp. of Rhode Island
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided May 28, 1998No. CIV.A 96-681LPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LAGUEUX, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. At issue is whether or not the Rehabilitation Hospital of Rhode Island (“RHRI”) and the Braintree Hospital Rehabilitation Network (“BHRN”)(together referred to as “defendants”) discriminated against plaintiff, Paula Tardie (“plaintiff’ or “Tardie”), based on her medical disability-in violation of various federal statutes.
In her complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendants, her' employers, discriminated against her because…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Laurence B. Greenburg, Etc. v. Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Donna Heilweil v. Mount Sinai HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Russell v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of RIDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2001
- Rainey v. Town of WarrenDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2000
- Routes v. HendersonDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999
- Canis v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
- Kriegel v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, DEPT. OF CORRS.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.