Legal Opinion

Schorr v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 12, 2010No. S10Q0193PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLEY, Presiding Justice.

When Bradley and Lori Schorr (named plaintiffs) financed the purchase of their home in Georgia, they executed a security deed which was subsequently assigned to Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. Upon full repayment of the underlying loan in 2003, the named plaintiffs demanded in writing that Countrywide cancel the security deed pursuant to OCGA § 44-14-3. The version of that statute which was in effect at the time, prior to its amendment in 2008, provided in relevant part that, upon the failure of the grantee or holder of a security deed or other instrument

to transmit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baldassari v. Public Finance TrustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Barnes v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. Rockdale County v. Finishline Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Hooten v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Norman v. United Cities Gas Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. BENATORCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Amin v. Mercedes-Benz United States, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  3. Bickerstaff v. Suntrust BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  4. Suntrust Bank v. Jeff Bickerstaff, Jr.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  5. J. MATTHEW COLEMAN v. GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API