Legal Opinion
City of Atlanta v. BENATOR
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 6, 2011No. A11A0769, A11A0770, A11A0771, A11A0772PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Presiding Judge.
The consolidated cases in this interlocutory appeal come from a putative class action filed against the city of Atlanta (“the city”), K & V Meter Automation, LLC (“K & V”), Khafra Operations, LLC (“Khafra”), Metals & Materials Engineers, LLC (“MME”), and Neptune Technology Group, Inc. (“Neptune”) 1 by residents who claim they were overcharged for water and sewage use. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part, and reverse in part in Case No. A11A0769; affirm in Case No. A11A0770, affirm in part, and reverse in part in Case No. A11A0771; and affirm in part, and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miree v. United StatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Backus v. ChilivisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Stendahl v. Cobb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- J. Kinson Cook of Georgia, Inc. v. Heery/MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- General Electric Co. v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. LoudermilkSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- City of Atlanta v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Amerik Supplies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
- District Owners Ass'n v. AMEC Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Edwards v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.