Legal Opinion

Bell v. Clay County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggabt

Complainant, E. A. Bell, sues to recover from Clay county and state and county officers sums paid as a privilege tax. The theory of the bill is that the payment was made under protest and duress, and that the tax was not a proper or legal charge against the complainant.

The bill was dismissed, on demurrer, and complainant has appealed.

The case for the complainant is that his pending civil action to recover, on a contract obligation, a sum of money many times in excess of the tax involved was resisted on the ground that his claim arose from his exercise of a taxable privilege in Clay county,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McHale v. WellmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Railroad v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Still v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railroad v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stroop v. Rutherford CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sky Transpo, Inc. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. City of Memphis v. W. M. S. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Dixon v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API