Legal Opinion

Pearl v. Roos

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1962Published

1Opinion of the CourtThomas P. Farley, J.

This is an application brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Bockville Centre (hereinafter referred to as the “ Board ”) granting the application of the respondent Schenone for permission to extend a nonconforming use. The Schenone property is located in Bockville Centre at No. 239 North Long Beach Boad and is an irregular parcel situate on the southeast corner of Long Beach Boad and Kennedy Avenue, having a frontage on Kennedy Avenue of 86.39 feet and on Long Beach Boad of 239 feet. It is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Syosset Holding Corp. v. SchlimmNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Anthony v. LibermanNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API