Legal Opinion

Syosset Holding Corp. v. Schlimm

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1956PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, J.

Petitioner seeks a review, under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, of the determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Hempstead, which denied it a special exception permit to erect a gasoline station on its property located at the northeast corner of Fulton Avenue and Surrey Lane. Said property is an unimproved parcel 135 feet by 110 feet, lying in a Business “ B ” District in which a gasoline filling station is a permitted use when authorized by the Board of Appeals in accordance with the standards established in the zoning ordinance.

This is not an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph County Planning BoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Woodhouse v. Bd. of Com'rs of Town of Nags HeadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. United States v. Ralph PrincipieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Cadem v. NannaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Harding v. Board of Zoning Appeals of MorgantownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API