Syosset Holding Corp. v. Schlimm
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, J.
Petitioner seeks a review, under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, of the determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Hempstead, which denied it a special exception permit to erect a gasoline station on its property located at the northeast corner of Fulton Avenue and Surrey Lane. Said property is an unimproved parcel 135 feet by 110 feet, lying in a Business “ B ” District in which a gasoline filling station is a permitted use when authorized by the Board of Appeals in accordance with the standards established in the zoning ordinance.
This is not an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
3Cited by34 opinions
- Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph County Planning BoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Woodhouse v. Bd. of Com'rs of Town of Nags HeadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- United States v. Ralph PrincipieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Cadem v. NannaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Harding v. Board of Zoning Appeals of MorgantownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.