Legal Opinion
McQuade v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided May 15, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal by defendant from judgment of the Seventh Judicial District Court. ...
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The action is to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff on January 4,1896, while waiting in an easterly direction on the southerly crosswalk at Lexington avenue and ■Fifty-second street in this city. She had crossed the westerly track of the defendant’s cable road, was struck by one of its cars going north on the easterly track and thrown down Upon her knees, receiving the injuries of which she complains.
The plaintiff’s testimony was to the effect that the street was prefectly clear as far as she could see; that she did not see any car .coming; and the first thing she knew…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Byrne v. New York Central & Hudson River R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Cullen v. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Krauss v. Wallkill Valley RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Mahon v. BurnsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crenshaw v. . Street R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Curtin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
- Neudoerffer v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Neudoerffer v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896