Legal Opinion

Cowart v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided August 8, 2006No. 5:04 CV 312 CARPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROYAL, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 35]. Plaintiffs have filed a Response [Doc. 40] and Defendant has filed a Reply [Doc. 47]. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Furthermore, as discussed below, Plaintiffs’ request to amend their complaint is also GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall have fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order to amend their Complaint.

BACKGROUND

This case involves a coverage dispute between…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harding v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Spillane v. AXA FINANCIAL, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. D'Elia v. Unum Life Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Crooms v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
  5. Clark v. Unum GroupDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API