Cowart v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, M.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROYAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 35]. Plaintiffs have filed a Response [Doc. 40] and Defendant has filed a Reply [Doc. 47]. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Furthermore, as discussed below, Plaintiffs’ request to amend their complaint is also GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall have fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order to amend their Complaint.
BACKGROUND
This case involves a coverage dispute between…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harding v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Spillane v. AXA FINANCIAL, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- D'Elia v. Unum Life Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Crooms v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
- Clark v. Unum GroupDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022