Van Arsdale v. Findley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District 'Court, Logan County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Actipn by W. 0. Van Arsdale against S. S. Findley, and M. E. Findley and others intervene. From a judgment for interveners, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
EOS SEE, C.
This was an action by W. 0. Van Arsdale against S. S. Findley on a judgment of the district court of Sedgwick county, Kan. M. E. Findley, S. F. Haw-ley, and M. J. Wallace intervened in the case, claiming the property which had been attached. There was a judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant, S. S. Findley, and a judgment for the interveners for the attached property. From this judgment in favor of the interveners, the plaintiff has appealed.
It appears from the evidence that S. S. Findley, prior to the time of the transaction out of which suit arose, had been a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Schreyer v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Horbach v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- First National Bank v. BaylessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Boatmen's Savings Bank v. OverallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Brundage v. CheneworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. LeecraftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Holt v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952