Syncromatic Air Conditioning Corp. v. Williams Oil-O-Matic Heating Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, affirming that of the Examiner of Interferences, sustaining the opposition filed hy appellee to the registration by appellant of the mark “Syncromatic.”
On November 6,1935 appellant filed an application for registration of its trade-mark “Syncromatic” for use on air conditioning systems. On January 22, 1936 appellee filed notice of opposition to the registration of “Syncromatic,” alleging that it is confusingly similar to appellee’s registered marks “Air-O-Matic” (for air conditioning systems), “Dist-O-Matic,” “Gas-O-Matic,”…
2Cited by5 opinions
- L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. United Conditioning Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Magnaflux Corporation v. Sonoflux CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Syncromatic Corporation v. Eureka Williams Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Eureka Williams Corp. v. Kres-Kno Oil Burner Mfg. Co., IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Eureka Williams Corp. v. Kres-Kno Oil Burner Mfg. Co., IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953