Noble Energy, Inc. v. Prospective Investment & Trading Co.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR., District Judge.
Before the court is “Noble’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Burden of Proof as to Liability” (R. # 124) wherein the mover seeks to have the court rule in advance of trial as to its burden of proof at trial. Specifically, Noble Energy, Inc. (“Noble”) maintains that because defendant, The Prospective Investment and Trading Company, Ltd. (“PITCO”), refused Noble’s tender of defense, under Oklahoma law, 1 Noble need only prove that it was potentially liable, not actually liable on the claim for which it seeks indemnity. PITCO, on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Stewart v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Kansas Gas and Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.