Legal Opinion
Herm Hughes & Sons, Inc. v. Quintek
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided June 5, 1992No. 900529-CAPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION 1
RUSSON, Judge:
Herm Hughes & Sons, Inc. (Hughes) appeals the trial court’s ruling that no contract existed between Hughes and Quintek. We affirm.
I. FACTS
Hughes is a general contractor doing business in the state of Utah. In October 1983, Hughes, in preparing a bid for construction of an elementary school in Roy, Utah, solicited bids from area subcontractors. Quintek, a subcontractor, prepared a bid to provide roof trusses for the project, which bid proposal was communicated by telephone to Hughes on October 25, 1983. The bid proposal was also reduced to writing and mailed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
- In re the Arbitration between Marlene Industries Corp. & Carnac Textiles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Duval & Co. v. MalcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- U. S. Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. Semco Manufacturing, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Bailey v. CallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Equitable Life & Casualty Insurance Co. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Gage Products Co. v. Henkel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- In Re Estate of BolingerMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Uhrhahn Construction & Design, Inc. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
- Homestead Golf Club, Inc. v. Pride StablesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.