Legal Opinion

Charles H. Schlobohm v. Pepperidge Farm, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 29, 1987No. 86-1461PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

The district court’s award to a terminated franchisee of attorney’s fees, prejudgment interest, and costs turns on the interpretation of an arbitration agreement as well as the application of Texas and federal law to the franchisee’s lawsuit. We modify the judgment to eliminate the award of attorney’s fees and costs, and affirm.

I

Charles Schlobohm owned a Pepperidge Farm franchise. His contract provided that Pepperidge Farm could terminate the franchise without cause upon written notice. The contract further provided that upon termination Pepperidge Farm would pay…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Texas Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. McKinley v. DrozdTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Okon v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Ellis v. WaldropTexas Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,372 Executone Information Systems, Inc. v. Lloyd K. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. PMAC, LTD.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Hennig Production Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  4. Vanessa Menke v. Eric MonchecourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Tunison v. Continental Airlines Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API