Legal Opinion

Bird v. Wilcox

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1919No. 22,145PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdren, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by an excluded partner for an accounting and for recovery from his associates of his share of proceeds of the business. The plaintiff recovered, and the defendants appeal.

While the charging part of the petition did not use the word partners, or the word partnership, it stated in full the facts concerning the relationship of the parties, and disclosed a partnership. Besides this, the petition alleged a demand for a partnership settlement and accounting, and the prayer for relief contained the characteristic words of a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shoemake v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Goben v. BarrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Crawford v. ForresterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Potucek v. BlairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. McCrae v. Bradley Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API