People v. Barber
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentTitone, J.
I agree with my colleagues that a represented defendant has no absolute right, constitutional or otherwise, to file a pro se supplemental brief on appeal. *655Accordingly, although I find the Appellate Division’s refusal to accept defendant’s pro se supplemental brief puzzling, I would not vote to reverse the court’s order affirming the conviction on that ground. However, in the final analysis, I cannot concur in the majority’s decision to affirm without even commenting upon the significant evidentiary argument defendant has made.
It is defendant’s contention that he was unfairly prevented from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- People v. BoutonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Freeman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. . Van GaasbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.