Legal Opinion
Democratic-Farmer-Labor State Central Committee v. Holm
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 2, 1948No. 34,815PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Boring, Chief Justice.
This is a proceeding in this court under M. S. A. 205.78 initiated by petition by those purporting to be the chairman and the secretary of the state central committee of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor party, which, for the sake of convenience, will hereinafter be referred to as the DFL party, seeking an order or writ requiring the secretary of state to correct a claimed error or omission in the preparation of ballots for the general election to be held November 2, 1948, insofar as those ballots contain the names of presidential electors nominated by the convention of that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- County of Cass v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Marcum v. Ballot Com'rsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Craig v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- In Re Objections to the Certificate of Nomination of FairchildNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Everett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- William J. Irish v. Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Irish v. Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- LaRose v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978