Legal Opinion

Goff v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2002No. 24340PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NANCY STEFFEN RAHMEYER, Judge.

Patrick Leroy Goff (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence because of ineffective assistance of counsel brought under Rule 29.15.1 Movant was convicted of the class D felony of possession of burglar’s tools in violation of § 569.180.2 Movant predicates his motion on two bases: first, that the class A misdemeanor offense of possession of a tool to break into a vending machine in violation of § 578.445 should have been given as a lesser included offense of the class D felony of possession of burglar’s tools in violation of § 569.180…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. GomezMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API